| Histo
Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lymphoid Tissues |
Mucosal Tissues |
|
Table Analyzed |
Lymphoid vs Mucosal Histo |
|
| 1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
1 |
|
Column B |
Mucosal Tissues |
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
vs. |
vs. |
|
| 1 |
1 |
|
Column A |
Lymphoid Tissues |
|
| 1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
Unpaired t test |
|
|
| 3 |
2 |
|
P value |
< 0.0001 |
|
| 1 |
0 |
|
P value summary |
**** |
|
| 3 |
2 |
|
Significantly different? (P < 0.05) |
Yes |
|
| 3 |
0 |
|
One- or two-tailed P value? |
Two-tailed |
|
| 3 |
2 |
|
t, df |
t=4.613 df=78 |
|
| 3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
1 |
|
How big is the difference? |
|
|
| 3 |
2 |
|
Mean ± SEM of column A |
1.875 ± 0.1665, n=32 |
|
| 3 |
1 |
|
Mean ± SEM of column B |
0.9792 ± 0.1133, n=48 |
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
Difference between means |
-0.8958 ± 0.1942 |
|
| 1 |
1 |
|
95% confidence interval |
-1.282 to -0.5092 |
|
| 0 |
1 |
|
R squared |
0.2143 |
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
F test to compare variances |
|
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
F,DFn, Dfd |
1.439, 31, 47 |
|
| 0 |
0 |
|
P value |
0.2552 |
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
P value summary |
ns |
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
Significantly different? (P < 0.05) |
No |
|
| 1 |
1 |
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
| 2 |
1 |
|
| 2 |
0 |
|
| 0 |
0 |
|
| 3 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|